Founded by Steve Stallings. The Unofficial Martin Guitar Forum is an independent Internet forum which is not in any manner related to or affiliated with C. F. Martin & Co., (The Martin Guitar Company) Nazareth, PA. The statements and opinions expressed in the Unofficial Martin Guitar Forum are solely those of the individuals posting the same and are not those of C.F. Martin & Co., The Martin Guitar Company, the Unofficial Martin Guitar Forum, its administrators, moderators, agents and other voluntary staff, its supporters, financial or otherwise, or its members, guests or other contributors. The Unofficial Martin Guitar Forum does not sponsor or endorse any product or service referred to, submitted or suggested by any member, guest or contributor to the Forum. The Unofficial Martin Guitar Forum and its voluntary staff shall have no responsibility or liability whatsoever to any person or organization with respect to any matter posted by any individual on the Unofficial Martin Guitar Forum, for the deletion of any such matter, for the content thereof, or for the banning, suspension or other sanctioning of any user from this Forum, or for the denial of an application to become a member of this Forum. The content and accuracy of any post are solely the responsibility of the member making the post. The Unofficial Martin Guitar Forum shall further not be responsible for references or links to other Internet sites or links contained on other Internet sites to the Unofficial Martin Guitar Forum or to the UMGF, or for the contents thereof. This specifically includes the CafePress Store for UMGF Memorabilia, which is not owned, operated or controlled by the UMGF but by Cafepress.com, an independent organization which markets, sells and ships the items contained in the CafePress Store and retains the proceeds therefrom. The sole function of the UMGF with respect thereto is to provide a link for the convenience of its members. By using, browsing or consulting this Forum, you consent to the foregoing terms as well as to the guidelines set forth in the Forum Guidelines and Feedback section and the general terms of use of Yuku. The exclusive venue for proceedings against the Unofficial Martin Guitar Forum, its members, trustees, officers or Administrators is the Superior Court, Hunterdon County, New Jersey, and any such proceeding shall be governed by New Jersey law. No damages or monetary awards of any nature, including attorneys fees or punitive damages may be assessed against the UMGF, its members, trustees, officers or Administrators under any circumstances whatsoever.
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
pfittipaldi |
Goodalls |
Lead | |
|
I'm been looking at an '07 Goodall Trad OM. Anyone have thoughts on this guitar, or Goodalls in general. Thanks, Peter.
|
|||
sugarinthegourd |
|||
|
I like their Traditional guitars a lot. Not a totally vintage voice but a cross between that and the more harmonic-rich Goodall voice. They play great too.
Really nice neck. They don't seem to hold their value so well for some reason. Gryphon recently had (may still have) a 12-fret 000 slothead at an amazingly
low price.
John
"The good life is one inspired by love and guided by knowledge."
- Bertrand Russell "Wisdom, compassion, and courage are the three universally recognized moral qualities of men." - Confucius |
|||
n7qx |
|||
|
I had the Dread version of the Tradtional Rosewood...It was a very responsive instrument, like fretting butter. A real easy player and a mellow tone...
John
HD-28 H&D TDM H&D OM |
|||
masa |
|||
|
I own a Goodall Concert Jumbo and am very happy with it. Very, very well made and very responsive. I agree with the others, that the neck is nice and easy to
play. Quite a different sound than a Martin. I would say that my guitar is not loud like a Dread can be, instead it has a beautifully balanced tone across the
strings with clear bass and treble and a lot of richness. I am a fingerstlye guitarist, so loud is not really high on my list of things to look for ... but
tone and balance are definitely high on my list. I played many, many guitars (Martin, Collings, Larivee, Gibson, SantaCruz, etc., etc.) over two years before
selecting a Goodall. And I do own Martin as well. I have to disagree with Jon (sugarinthegourd) on Goodall guitars not holding value. Check out Buffalo
Brothers used selection of Goodalls - they are almost the same price as the new ones. masa
|
|||
Madisonian |
|||
|
I've played lots of Goodalls, and think they are special. So are Martins, but different.
When I try a Martin I'm looking for great tonal quality, resonance and sustain - on guard against over braced, tight or otherwise less responsive examples. And the neck needs some attention, too - I don't get along as well with some. When I try a Goodall, OTOH, I know the resonance and sustain will always be there. And I always love his necks - they seem "roomy" for the same 1 3/4," and I suspect there is a touch more radius than stock Martins. The tonal quality still can vary considerably with different tonewoods and examples, like Martins. But what I'm on guard for with Goodalls is the excessively boomy or unrestrained examples whose overtones tend to fall over each other in a jumbled mess. It's a fine line. I'm not sure I've ever felt a Goodall was tight or over braced. My favorite models are the TROM and Grand Concert (a smaller body as opposed to the Concert Jumbo). The three finest I've ever played were two GC cutaways with Italian Spruce, one over EIR, the other MadRose (I now regret very much that I didn't buy one of these two) - and a Braz/Red Spruce TROM (too rich$$ or I'd have it). Close behind were several EIR/Red Spruce TROM's.
Evan
1974 D-28S, 1999 Larrivee L-02, 2005 000-28VS, 2005 Larrivee 000-50, 2006 0MC Fingerstyle 1, 2005 000C-16SRNE, 2006 000-18GE, 2003 OM-18GE, 2008 M-38 Custom, 2008 175th LXM |
|||
jscio |
|||
|
Goodall OM's are excellent guitars. I've had the good fortune to play three or four and they were all excellent. Great playability and overall sound.
|
|||
MadtownMark |
|||
But what I'm on guard for with Goodalls is the excessively boomy or unrestrained examples whose overtones tend to fall over each other in a jumbled mess. It's a fine line. I concur on this point. I owned a Goodall GC (ADI/HOG) for a while... but over time found it TOO lush and overtoney for the style of music I was playing (bluesier/folksier). The notes would just bash into each other and hang in the air until tomorrow... a GOOD thing for sensitive fingerstyle. I have played some smaller body Goodalls in the TRAD style that did knock me out. They are an acquired taste, but beautiful instruments
"it's a sad and beautiful world."
- from Down By Law (Jim Jarmusch) '08 David Newton 'Sabine' (00) Johnson JG535S campfire beater Deering Goodtime Banjo |
|||
jscio |
|||
|
I have to disagree. The Goodalls I've had the pleasure of playing have been nicely balanced and in possession of "the sound" that you look for.
|
|||
sugarinthegourd |
|||
MadtownMark wrote: That's EXACTLY why I sold my TR-000. Much as I loved it, it sounded too rich and sustain-y for the folk/blues music I play. But boy, it sounded and played great.
"The good life is one inspired by love and guided by knowledge."
- Bertrand Russell "Wisdom, compassion, and courage are the three universally recognized moral qualities of men." - Confucius |
|||
masa |
|||
|
Madisonian - wow. Great post. That is exactly how I feel about Martin and Goodall.
masa
Last Edited By: masa
05/04/09 12:27 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
pfittipaldi |
|||
|
Thanks for all the input, it's been helpful. Now, the other guitar that is in my top consider-list, has been the Martin Juber OMC, the model with
madagascar rosewood w/adi-top. Does it make sense to try to compare these two guitars, the Goodall TradOM, and this Martin? Thanks. Peter.
|
|||
Short Balding Guy |
|||
|
Peter; I understand the question of comparing the TROM Goodall to the Juber (madi/adi). I own a Goodall TROMc ('04 ER/Sitka) and owned for a short time a
Juber (madi/adi). I opin below about the guitars.
I play acoustic blues music most of the time. The music that I most enjoy is a fat tone with a hint of warmth in the bass. Not so many partials that the bass notes are loud but loose distinction. The bass sound must be more immediate than delayed or "boomed." The bass noteds on the Goodall can be changed and have a large range of options. The trebles must have a bright sparkle with some fatness to the sound. Not shimmery and brittle. The TROM allowes me to mute the bass and get a sharper, immediate muted bass sound. This is more like the big foot stomping drum in the drum set. I like that I can get the clear and the bumf sound with just changing technique. The trebles can be strocked to get more shimmer or tinkle, but the Goodall allows them to be snapped and you get a jumping melody. I have found that strings on the TROMc have made a huge difference. I am playing a Curt Mangan PB 12-54 and enjoy the more fundamental tone they allow. For many string changes I loved the newtone pb masterclass (Guitar Gallery custom sets). Lately as I have been playing more Blind Boy Fuller stuff I wanted less a less "tingly sound" hence the string change. When at Chirstmas I needed to play holiday songs and some classical pieces -out came the Newtones. The Goodall is set-up like a champ. The fretboard radius and the c shaped neck works wonders for me. No fatigue cramps from pushing or gripping. The Juber was a guitar that I had trouble getting a set-up I enjoyed. I ended up with re-dressing frets, leveling the fretboard, adjusting the nut/bridge and having the neck finish touched up at a local luthier's (here in MPLS.). This was on a new guitar. Granted I am particular in the set-up and playability, but the work did not make sense on such a fine Martin instrument. Picky or an abnormal instrument aside the sound had an immediate sound with a shimmery edge. The Mad. wood combo'd guitar sounded so rich compared to the other Juber models I sampled. I found that the rich sound was pleasing to my ears, but I had more challenges playing the guitar within the blues songs and sounds that I wished to hear come from my hands. I loved the rich sound in the shop and them found it harder to control, in my music, at home. The local pros (blues/jazz and folk) here in MPLS play a variety of brands(Ryan, Goodalls, Martins, HD's, Collings, Nationals, etc.). It has been my learning from these folks, that the player can draw the "special sounds" they desire to hear out of many of the different brands. I admit that on occassion I have been questioned or hear comments on my "blues Goodall." I work to show them that my novice hands and heart can still play quality, entertaining blues songs on this or my other guitars. I hope the above helps. Best, Eric - |
|||
Short Balding Guy |
|||
|
Peter; Another consideration for your search is the Martin Grossman model. I played a couple local examples and thought that they were excellent guitars that
rivaled the Goodall TROM for appealing sound on Blind Blake songs. I would have loved to sit in a room and alternate playing my songs on these two models. The
set-ups were more appealing and would require less tweaking than I previousely mentioned. I have wondered what Blind Lemon Jefferson songs in general or the
contrast between Untrue Blues (Blind Boy Fuller) would sound like. Naked fingers or thumb/finger picks worked well. I may just have to arrange some playing
time at our local guitar botique.
All the best, Eric - |
|||
Dulope |
|||
|
A Goodall 000 might be a little to colorful of tone for blues and ragtime - Take a look at the Goodall parlor ... it's actually a 00 size with 14 frets to
the body in a 25" scale - The smaller box moves less air so the overtoines are less dominent and you still get that Goodall wave of sound going out but
tighter balamce and string seperation
-------------------------------------------------
Collings 01sb ~ Goodall AKP-14 ~ National Resorocket - Gibson CF-100e ________________________________ "Buy used and buy often" |
|||
magictwanger |
|||
|
I played the heck out of a lovely OM last winter.I just kept coming back to it,at my local dealer.Goodall makes a great instrument,IMO.
|
|||
pauljcat |
|||
|
I prefer Goodalls and Lowdens on fingerstyle to any other guitars. Go to the website Dream Guitars, and look under Previously Sold Instruments, they will have
an archive of many guitars. If you compare those two brands to the rest they have more overtones and sound so much more alive. I prefer Lowden but Goods are as
good.
|
|||
scarab100 |
|||
|
If you like the sound of the Goodall Traditional OM, you will also like the GC. They are the same guitar, except for cosmetics. I currently have an Adi/Maple
GC that is a wonderful instrument.
Warren |
|||
Andre Guitar |
|||
Dulope wrote:I personally think that's his best sounding model. Actually, I can't say I've ever tried a Goodall I didn't like. They're very fine guitars. But the last Grand Concert I played was a strange experience. It was a used model, and the relatively low price caught my eye, so I grabbed it off the rack. It played really nicely and I was blown away by its lush sound. But after a while, I realized it was just "too much". I had heard the expression "a guitar on steroids" before, but I had never experienced it. This was the one! Goodall's parlor, on the other hand, was a lot closer to ideal. Huge sound, out of such a small box, resonant but much tighter and balanced across the strings. James Goodall is a fine builder, and very responsive to his clients. (I had contacted him once on a potential custom build). So, I'm sure he could build one to taste if need be. But generally speaking, his guitars tend towards the lush and resonant end of the spectrum, which may or may not be ideal depending on your playing goals. Definitely worth playing before buying, if you are able to do that.
Best regards,
Andre |
|||
dhcrow |
|||
|
I love my TR-000. Plenty of sustain and great overtones. Hard to keep it tamed but when it works, it's a beautiful sound. So much fun to play. I keep it
strung with Elixers.
"Martin guitars - just try to buy one!"
Everything you do shapes our future! Be careful out there! Crow |
|||
DarrellTriple0 |
|||
|
That's not the one from the Emporium, is it Dennis? Or is it the Goodall you mentioned you already owned?
I took a trip back, after our visit, to do a little more Goodall testing! Beautiful as they are, I just couldn't find one that didn't strike me as being too lush, for what I play. Darrell
|
|||