<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>NAMM and Lacey </title>
        <link>http://theunofficialmartinguitarforum.yuku.com/topic/129929/NAMM-and-Lacey</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Saw this from an AOL link.LA times article on NAMM and Lacey act. ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2011, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:05:56 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 23:09:32 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: NAMM and Lacey  ]]></title>
			<link>http://theunofficialmartinguitarforum.yuku.com/reply/1409718/NAMM-and-Lacey#reply-1409718</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think we all support the conscientious management of endangered flora and fauna.&nbsp; However, simply because a law is initiated for the purpose of conservation doesn't not mean it effectively results in the efficient and effect conservation.&nbsp; Spe...<br /><a href="http://theunofficialmartinguitarforum.yuku.com/reply/1409718/NAMM-and-Lacey#reply-1409718">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Agerbaek)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theunofficialmartinguitarforum.yuku.com/reply/1409718</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 23:09:30 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: NAMM and Lacey  ]]></title>
			<link>http://theunofficialmartinguitarforum.yuku.com/reply/1408133/NAMM-and-Lacey#reply-1408133</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ &nbsp;
Interesting e-mail received today from the new-england-luthiers@yahoogroups.com:Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:05:16 +0000Subject: [new-england-luthiers] LACEY ACT UPDATE
&nbsp; 




I found this post by Chuck Erickson (linkedIn) in another forum...<br /><a href="http://theunofficialmartinguitarforum.yuku.com/reply/1408133/NAMM-and-Lacey#reply-1408133">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Stringasaurus Rex)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theunofficialmartinguitarforum.yuku.com/reply/1408133</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:26:47 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: NAMM and Lacey  ]]></title>
			<link>http://theunofficialmartinguitarforum.yuku.com/reply/1396989/NAMM-and-Lacey#reply-1396989</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ dockofhtebay wrote:
" Of course most vendors bought their Madi before the coup, so perfectly legal."

The real problem is not so much for the importers these days, it's for the luthiers who laid in stocks long before any of this came up. The wood might...<br /><a href="http://theunofficialmartinguitarforum.yuku.com/reply/1396989/NAMM-and-Lacey#reply-1396989">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Alan Carruth)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theunofficialmartinguitarforum.yuku.com/reply/1396989</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:33:08 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: NAMM and Lacey  ]]></title>
			<link>http://theunofficialmartinguitarforum.yuku.com/reply/1396737/NAMM-and-Lacey#reply-1396737</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ yep, and a recent article on Madi.  Of course most vendors bought their Madi before the coup, so perfectly legal.  but probably not much flow in years to come.  now i can go back and worry about exporting a job to china every time i turn on my iPhone........<br /><a href="http://theunofficialmartinguitarforum.yuku.com/reply/1396737/NAMM-and-Lacey#reply-1396737">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (dockofthebay)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theunofficialmartinguitarforum.yuku.com/reply/1396737</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:12:22 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ NAMM and Lacey  ]]></title>
			<link>http://theunofficialmartinguitarforum.yuku.com/topic/129929/NAMM-and-Lacey</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Saw this from an AOL link.LA times article on NAMM and Lacey act. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jaymehime)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theunofficialmartinguitarforum.yuku.com/topic/129929</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:05:56 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>
